Steve, I think some glitches got into the text in a couple of places. Setting those aside, here’s what I intended to say: once the Sole Member structure has been adopted by the Board into the Bylaws and ICANN therefore has member, it would “require 2/3 vote of the Board and the vote of the Sole Member to approve any amendment to ICANN’s Articles of Incorporation.” Hope that’s helpful. Rosemary From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 1:47 PM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Revised Fundamental Bylaws section for 2nd draft proposal We displayed and discussed this document on CCWG call Tue 29-July. Circulating this just so we have it for Thursday’s doc review. The only new text arose from remarks by Holly and Rosemary earlier this week, regarding the Single Member voting: Any change to ICANN’s A change to the Articles of Incorporation would require approval by both Board and Members: “9. These Articles may be amended by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the directors of the Corporation. When the Corporation has members, any such amendment must be ratified by a two-thirds (2/3) majority of the members voting on any proposed amendment.” Under the proposal for the would require 2/3 vote of the Board and 2/3 vote of the Community Mechanism as Sole Member, the Member would need to approve any change to ICANN’s present status as a California nonprofit public benefit corporation. —Steve — Steve DelBianco Executive Director NetChoice http://www.NetChoice.org<http://www.netchoice.org/> and http://blog.netchoice.org<http://blog.netchoice.org/> +1.703.615.6206