I'm happy to set up a side discussion list since this is one of the key 'known unknowns' in this process. On 22/05/16 07:58, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 11:13:38PM +0000, Phil Corwin wrote:
Indeed, there is no definitive determination as to whether property is involved.
What is never clear to me in these discussions is what property people think there _could_ be. I don't mean this to be a rhetorical question.
Let me put it another way: suppose there were property there for the US Government to hold, and they decided to hold it and refuse to let people in the world use it. What is it that people think would go away?
This is probably not a subject for this list, since it's not directly relevant to the CCWG. But I would appreciate off-list observations of anyone who wanted to provide them.
Thanks,
A