Bruce, May you pls explain what are yiu taking about? It is difficult to get a clear understanding of your telegraphic message . Cheers Kavousd Sent from my iPhone
On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:03, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA> wrote:
Bruce,
thank you.
So, in other words the CCWG can write whatever report it gets Consensus on (of its appointed members), do Public Consultations as much as it wants, and send whatever final report it gets Consensus on (of its appointed members) to the Board which will then send it unmodified to the NTIA.
Which means, all this (rather expensive) nonsense in LA was unnecessary.
Unless one views this from the Board's (tactical) perspective.
Interesting...
greetings, el
On 2015-10-12 11:37, Bruce Tonkin wrote: Hello Eberhard,
It is the Board position, unless we pass a resolution to change it.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
-----Original Message----- From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org On Behalf Of Dr Eberhard W Lisse Sent: Monday, 12 October 2015 6:52 PM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Cc: directors@omadhina.net Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to Dublin
Bruce,
are you sharing your understanding or is this the Board's position?
greetings
On 2015-10-10 04:03, Bruce Tonkin wrote: Hello Paul,
Regarding:
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2015-02-12-en
The statement still holds.
The Board has provided input on a draft document so far, and has stated all along that it would raise any concerns along the way and not wait for a final proposal to raise any concerns.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin [...] -- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community