HI everyone, Are we sure we want to restrict ICANN to a Los Angeles headquarters? I'm not trying to bring up the jurisdiction issue in this post, more of a real estate issue. If a dozen years from now ICANN needs a new headquarters do we really want to restrict it to Los Angeles County if real estate prices, recruitment concerns or other issues would make it a better idea to set up shop in Orange, Riverside or another county within California? If there is a legal requirement to state the county in the Bylaws so be it; if not, I'd suggest that "State of California, United States of America" should suffice. Ed -apologies for not thinking of this earlier. On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org> wrote:
Per Mathieu's request, here is a one page summary of proposed way to deal with AoC section 8. I tried to reflect suggestions from our last call.
Look forward to discussion.
— Steve DelBianco Executive Director NetChoice http://www.NetChoice.org <http://www.netchoice.org/> and http://blog.netchoice.org +1.703.615.6206
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community