Never mind that I am concerned with the paraphrasing. el -- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
On Jun 8, 2015, at 22:03, Roelof Meijer <Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl> wrote:
I wonder; what would be a good process to have a substantial and fruitful discussion on a 85 pages document received less than 24 hours in advance?
Best,
Roelof
From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org> Date: maandag 8 juni 2015 13:05 To: "accountability-cross-community@icann.org" <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Public comments compilation & call #36 agenda
Dear all,
Attached to this email you will find a compilation of the comments received on your draft proposals.
Please note that: We anticipate that additional submissions might be sent; You can download all comments from the wiki page: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53778556; Due to the late availability of the translated materials, those reliant on these translated proposals to provide input will have the ability to submit their comments until 12 June at 23:59 UTC (see Adam's note). This document will be discussed during your call #36 – Tuesday, 9 June at 06:00-09:00 UTC (time converter) - see below a proposed agenda: Welcome, Roll-Call & SoI; Review of the public comments received on Draft Proposals; A.O.B Thanks,
Kind regards
Alice _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community