Hi Finn, this is what I went by: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/2015-March/000071.html If the Danish position has changed, happy to correct. Best, -- Head, Cyber Initiative Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi http://amsukumar.tumblr.com +91-9871943272 On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Finn Petersen <FinPet@erst.dk> wrote:
Dear Arun,
Thoughts - here is one!
You write "Several countries, notably Brazil, Spain, Denmark and Argentina, see the proposed modification as unacceptable."
Why did you include Denmark in the group of countries that oppose ST18 - your statement concerning Denmark is wrong!!!!
Please correct this.
Best,
Finn, GAC - Dk
Sendt fra min iPad
Den 27. okt. 2015 kl. 17.42 skrev "arun.sukumar@orfonline.org" < arun.sukumar@orfonline.org>:
CCWGers, plugging here a post I wrote on discussions around Stress Test 18.
http://blogs.cfr.org/cyber/2015/10/27/governments-v-icann-the-last-battle-be...
Thoughts welcome!
Best, Arun
Sent from my iPad
Head, Cyber Initiative Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi http://amsukumar.tumblr.com/ Ph: +91-9871943272
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community