Hi, I disagree. It is one of the factors that makes certain parts of the Guidelines less appropriate for ICANN than for GE. One of the things several of us attempted during the long course of the subgroup, before the matter was referred to the plenary, was to get Ruggie to to produce an explanatory version specific for Not-for-profit as he has done for other groups. So my two recommended edits, i.e inclusion of the "not-for-profit" modifier and the phrase "as appropriate" were in recognition of this being the case. avri On 29-Sep-17 03:23, Nigel Roberts wrote:
On 29/09/17 07:23, Greg Shatan wrote:
Whether ICANN is non-profit or not is beside the point. That is not the issue. Agreed. It is entirely beside the point and has no place in any statement as if it did.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community