Dear Staff, would somebody check why this mail appears as a follow up to the “Request for Clarification on Threshold Issue”. It is very annoying Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 29 Feb 2016, at 13:26, Nigel Roberts wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-35685999
This tells me that the right to free expression is one which ICANN should respect, and not merely 'as required by applicable law'.
It seems to me that 'applicable law' here would have ICANN institute policies allowing for takedown of the material that is contained in the books referred to in this article, would it not? _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community