Hi James, If I may ask, which of the work stream or working party does this fall? Will be good to know what action item of the CCWG gave birth to this. A pointer will be appreciated. Regards Sent from my Asus Zenfone2 Kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 27 Oct 2015 20:16, "James Gannon" <james@cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
Hi Greg,
A number of NCSG members and others who spoke on this issue in Dublin including myself had started work on this during Dublin and once we had something that was readable we brought it to the group to continue the work.
-James
From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday 27 October 2015 at 7:09 p.m. To: Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org> Cc: CCWG-Accountability Community < accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Contribution on Transparency Reforms for CCWG
In the interests of transparency, who is in the small subgroup?
Thanks!
Greg
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org> wrote:
All:
Here is a link to a document intended to contribute to CCWG's work on improving transparency at ICANN:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/11sX-zY5uie9s7zNeGz2GIRXk7BBg2xrbN_pplpJn...
The doc is the creation of small subgroup of CCWG participants focusing on this transparency issue. Feedback is most welcome!
Thanks, Robin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community