Sound proposals, and thanks to Germany for a nuanced view. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Please find attached a correspondence detailing the German position on IANA Stewardship Transition.
Alice, can you please add it to the correspondence section of our wiki ?
Best regards, Mathieu
-------- Message transféré -------- Sujet : German Position on IANA Stewardship Transition Date : Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:53:55 +0000 De : Hubert.Schoettner@bmwi.bund.de Pour : leonfelipe@sanchez.mx, thomas@rickert.net, mathieu.weill@afnic.fr
Dear Leon, dear Thomas, dear Mathieu,
please find attached a position paper for the discussion on the IANA-Stewardship-Transition. The position was developed in a multistakeholder process in Germany and is backed by the German government, eco-Association of the German Internet Industry, Denic e.G., ISOC.DE, DotBerlin and KRBE GmbH.
Best regards, Hubert Schöttner
--------------------------
Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs And Energy International Digital and Postal Policy, Internet Governance
Villemombler Str. 76 D - 53123 Bonn, Germany
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- - @arunmsukumar <http://www.twitter.com/arunmsukumar> Senior Fellow, Centre for Communication Governance <http://www.ccgdelhi.org> National Law University, New Delhi Ph: +91-9871943272