Hi, I just want to add that even some of us US citizens are very wary of giving US courts any say over ICANN. I have never seen a court that I would trust. And well dealing with something as unique as the ICANN multistakeholder model, I would be surprised to find a court that could be trusted to understand. Is there any way to add a clause that indicates a binding arbitration/mediation, perhaps an international binding arbitration/mediation would be the required escalation point? avri On 21-May-15 08:36, Chris Disspain wrote:
I believe that the threat of ICANN collapsing would be enough to convince an ICANN Board, put there by the community, and that very same community to get together and solve the issues between them. You believe that that is not enough and that there should be an option for that whole community to have a Californian court step in.
I believe that the contortions required to turn ICANN into a membership organisation are incredibly complicated and disempowering to non-US members of the community. You disagree.
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com