Or, perhaps, that GAC advice should not be bound by ICANN’s mission and core values? ________________________________ Brett Schaefer Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002 202-608-6097 heritage.org<http://heritage.org/> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mueller, Milton L Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 10:22 AM To: Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch; Becky.Burr@neustar.biz; accountability-cross-community@icann.org Cc: acct-staff@icann.org Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Deck for Meeting #75 Mission Statement discussion Jorge: Can you please clarify what the implications are of this: The GAC further expects that changes to ICANN’s mission and core values should not constrain the Board from accepting and implementing GAC advice. In MM: Do you mean to imply that there should be no limits of ICANN’s mission?