Dec. 18, 2015
12:18 a.m.
On 17 Dec 2015, at 22:44, Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com> wrote:
Malcolm,
No. We have no problem with having the Scope of Responsibilities be fundamental bylaws, and that obviously means we expect the Scope of Responsibilities to be fairly stable. Changes to the Scope of Responsibilities should require careful deliberation and considered action by the community as well as the Board. The Mission Statement should be even more stable and hardly ever require amendment.
Steve
Thank you, Steve.