Dear all, Since the IRP is part of the CWG dependencies on the CCWG work, I had forwarded the IRP document for CWG review as well. So far, we have received one friendly edit (below) from Chuck Gomes that I am passing along before the deadline for comments. Thank you, Grace From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com<mailto:cgomes@verisign.com>> Date: Friday, February 5, 2016 at 11:40 AM To: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org<mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>>, "cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>> Subject: RE: CCWG Update In the 2nd Reading Conclusions, item 1.a.iii.1 says: "ICANN should consider modification of Registry Agreements with gTLD Operators to expand scope of arbitration available thereunder to cover PTI service complaints." It seems to me that the wording should be stronger: "ICANN must modify Registry Agreements with gTLD Operators to expand scope of arbitration available thereunder to cover PTI service complaints." I think the same change should be made later in the document when this sentence occurs again. Chuck From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Grace Abuhamad Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 5:18 PM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CCWG Update Dear CWG-Stewardship, Today the CCWG-Accountability published its latest version of its recommendations on the IRP. Please see attached for text, and provide any comments you may have. As noted in the email below: * This version has been generated from the conclusion of the third reading document and includes the modification required by the CWG for PTI and has been reviewed by Becky Burr. * As such you will find attached 3 versions, Word and PDF red lined as well as a clean PDF version given the markups are extensive in some sections. * Once this legal review is completed (48 hours - ?20:00 ? UTC Saturday), results of the review will be published on this list, a final version will be generated and posted for final CCWG comments.? I have highlighted the deadline above since it is important for the CWG to follow this timeline as well. Considering the time pressure that the CCWG is under, we should do our best to not delay them further. If you are able to post on the CCWG list directly, that would be more efficient for them. Otherwise, I will work with the co-Chairs to transfer the information in time. I have also attached two documents that help track the status of the CCWG-Accountability work overall. Best, Grace From: <acct-staff-bounces@icann.org<mailto:acct-staff-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com<mailto:turcotte.bernard@gmail.com>> Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 2:45 PM To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>>, ACCT-Staff <acct-staff@icann.org<mailto:acct-staff@icann.org>> Subject: [Acct-Staff] CCWG - Recommendation 7 - Final draft version for legal review ? All, ?Per the request of the co-chairs we are publishing the final draft version of Annex 7 for legal review. This version has been generated from the conclusion of the third reading document and includes the modification required by the CWG for PTI and has been reviewed by Becky Burr. As such you will find attached 3 versions, Word and PDF red lined as well as a clean PDF version given the markups are extensive in some sections. Once this legal review is completed (48 hours - ?20:00 ? UTC Saturday), results of the review will be published on this list, a final version will be generated and posted for final CCWG comments.? ?Thank You. B?ernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support for CCWG _______________________________________________ Acct-Staff mailing list Acct-Staff@icann.org<mailto:Acct-Staff@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/acct-staff