Jordan In all good will, I'm genuinely puzzled. It seems to me that you are being either naive or disingenuous in below statement. I refer to Chris Lahatte's statement on a procedural point that is anything but dull. If there is a dearth of time for review, that is exactly when the major changes are slipped in, that are often not noticed until after its too late. So while I will 100% accept that the below description is possible, and even very like to be correct, running the show in this way is procedurally unfair as it excludes oversight and does not *ensure*, in a transparent way that nothing is being sprung on anyone. Put another way, I have to take your (or someone else's) word for it.
I'll close with a quite dull procedural point - the documents that you are not getting much time to review for these calls are generally a) making tiny, incremental changes from previous versions, and b) have been substantially the same for weeks. Nothing is being "sprung" on anyone right now.