Dear Andrew, Pls kindly note my message indicating that if we quickly reach a consensus on the matter for me it is perfect. I am worried about opening a new round of discussions so far as I know my CCWG Colleagues they quickly start to proposed changes .I wish to avoid that Regards Kavouss 2016-01-26 16:28 GMT+01:00 Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:22:15PM +0100, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
I have serious concerns to refer to MoU for the reasons that I explained in my eralier mail to Lawyers and further elaborated at the call CCWG Call
Yes, I think everyone understands the concerns of including the reference to an outside agreement. The text Izumi sent avoids that. It also modifies things consistent with what that MoU says and aligned with what ICANN actually does. Is it acceptable to you? I think it'd be tremendous if we could come to agreement on the list (if that is possible) instead of taking up time on the phone.
Best regards,
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community