Review and enhancement of DIDP has been a WS2 item for months. J. Beckwith Burr Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer From: <Schaefer>, Brett <Brett.Schaefer@heritage.org<mailto:Brett.Schaefer@heritage.org>> Date: Monday, November 2, 2015 at 1:06 PM To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>>, Keith Drazek <kdrazek@verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com>>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>> Cc: Accountability Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Transparency recap (Was: Contribution on Transparency Reforms for CCWG) That said, in the general discussion, I haven’t seen any real opposition to the call for: (1) granting the right of inspection to the SD or to the individual SOs/ACs; (2) improving the DIDP process; and (3) requiring ICANN to disclose its contacts with government to influence policy and the expenditures for that purpose.