Hi, Until such time as ewe have community standards on redactions, I think including the contractual or other provision they are relying on for the redaction, as Samantha did in her note, is a useful measure. avri On 17-Jul-15 09:56, Chris Disspain wrote:
I don’t believe much ‘convincing’ would be necessary el.
Cheers,
Chris
On 17 Jul 2015, at 17:52 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA <mailto:el@lisse.NA>> wrote:
I am wondering if we can perhaps convince ICANN to in the interim when they redact documents, to write something like "Redacted on request of ........" so that if we were to take ICANN staff by their word that they only redact because of transparency (!) we know at least which side they are on :-)-O
greetings, el
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus