-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Further to my below, and you are all aware that I raised this as part of my intervention during our interaction with the GAC, this is from the GAC Communique: With regard to the CCWG-Accountability: • GAC Members will continue to work within the CCWG to develop the proposals for enhancing ICANN’s accountability, with reporting back to the GAC and guidance on major issues from the GAC as a whole; • The GAC will work to identify particular issues for governments as both individual or collective participants in any new or enhanced mechanisms; • The next stage of the GAC input to relevant work streams will include public policy principles that could guide development of any new or enhanced accountability mechanisms; • The GAC will contribute to the work of the CCWG towards a consensus proposal for submission to the ICANN Board. Both processes will have the highest priority for GAC inter-sessional work, the GAC being mindful of the updated timeline. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/gac-to-board-11feb15-en... I am grateful to the GAC for clarifying this, in particular the two-way channel to the GAC as a whole. greetings, el On 2015-02-08 11:08 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
I am EXTREMELY concerned about the GAC, since apparently after several years of work in the Framework of Interpretation Working Group in which 5 liaisons of the GAC (Heather Dryden, Jayantha Fernando, Frank March, Alice Munyua, Suzanne Radell) participated, and during which we briefed the GAC at almost every ICANN Meeting about our progress, they are now basically saying they know nothing about it, and they are upset about that we did it, never mind the charter and their participation.
This casts doubt on the reliability and predictability of any GAC involvement and I need to know why GAC members are present and liaising (on behalf of the GAC) when the GAC later reneges.
This needs to be cleared and/or settled, prior to any further work being conducted in ANY Wg with GAC involvement, but in particular this one. [...] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIVAwUBVN4Ek5cFHaN5RT+rAQIC1xAAkUcPuURi2nKFWqwt4MBTv+hVWUQx83hk mFo3LgQF4+a4SpzEk36viu7B6hzg0lsRebcSZTg2irOJDY1qxH0pYqhxej6BvFkF Q5mnJ02ChBjG20HEq2mb4+IUIEN2MJVKme+9aC8lXqIH+Qr3FVIzmPq4LlDKc/O/ 5ze9wHJf3RVWYD+7W6vSM7dxMywLh4v83U6sJVYV5hIfja5Boa+twvssZidaI1s0 9SDe/OXstMp7T8m5lg+xkzDn2O81yjoJr19GAjSjRtums49Olxqb24059/eaHln7 dQ3T7AIGyQGuwL7ZW7U037XgR05vUPZd5Kugj7PNfgfBG2+4jZNfTcy4Q8YpW26v 5mBsHmq+uOmA/NFocrKoVG6p5/ZglNY+7d5B/gliZXOb1wQFEdMCVBKgIZi4TZMY TzBfIBsAC7QB5Ptc+cc2xiWBFwsPmEidX2RhOFBP3YkaZtGkQYIt1Fnb1g7Cizo2 4UQRs6YJwu65udKiZ3U//WhlroV0J90NyXfzha59eQoZVhzrlXHRglYQ4R04Pa53 CKzIi0kzjKj8U8RuOhkl3eipqk9Oy2I8HiAH5t0hnyNWreRKmIkslhxuFYQeKtkU NwVeHIKxnOimnr8O1oS073/IZmOG4zjUde1v0yMbAkmCvO2zD7zX4VSr3GddSSXx Avrssct3q1E= =zG+Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----