I am not sure I agree fully agree (I am in favor of a Public Comment whereas you seem to be against it) , but what we all should agree on is that if we do a Public Comment we do it right. el On 2015-12-03 16:45, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
I agree completely and according to our charter, we are at the point in our PROCESS where we take our proposal to the chartering organizations. It is only weak mindedness on our part that has led to any public comment at this juncture and we run the risk of letting the tail wag the dog, so to speak, thereby derailing our PROCESS.
-----Original Message----- From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org On Behalf Of Dr Eberhard W Lisse Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 2:07 AM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Cc: directors@omadhina.net Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Issues with Providing Public Comments on CCWG-Accountability Proposal
Process matters.
el
[...[ -- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/