If you were (s)elected by the ccNSO to represent us in this body, yes, I would. But of course only on those issues now also (rightfully) decided through „the ICANN mechanisms" Best, Roelof On 15-04-15 12:21, "Dr Eberhard Lisse" <el@lisse.NA> wrote:
How does this solve the ccTLD issue?
Will you let me make decisions that affect SIDN as the .NL ccTLD Manager?
Most assuredly not I would think.
el
On 2015-04-15 11:04, Roelof Meijer wrote:
I am not a lawyer either. But I think that a lot of issues Samantha identifies are resolved if there’s only one member: a single legal entity containing the stakeholders roughly as in the „Community Council” or „permanent CCWG” proposals. The constituencies represented in the single member, won’t have to become legal entities themselves. And we won’t have to add or remove members when we gain new insights as to what stakeholders should be represented, they would just be added to/removed from the group forming the single member.
Maybe this single member should itself be an association?
Best,
Roelof
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community