Thanks for the explanation Bruce. I'm sure we'll be all relieved when this chapter in our lives is done, and we can proceed with things at a more considered pace. Best, Ed Morris Sent from my iPhone
On 17 Feb 2016, at 21:35, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
Hello Edward,
Why was the Board unable to provide a response akin to its current proposal prior to the calls where the compromise proposal was accepted by the CCWG?
The Board comprises 20 members that also need time to consider a proposal and reach consensus on a view. The GAC compromise emerged after the Board's last meeting together, and the matter has been considered via the email list since it emerged from the CCWG.
There is still an ongoing discussion on the Board mailing list, just like there is on this list.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community