On 05-Feb-15 10:51, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
Currently i believe board are formerly expected to act in the interest of the organisation,
Yes they are. And they are selected because those who select think they will do so and will do so consistent with the views of the (s)electors. there are those who do little to nothing. there are those who never consult. there are those who forget that the community knows what is best for the community. there are those who use their power to abuse. There needs to be a way to remove them - otherwise there is little reality to the accountability. By all means make it difficult. Require unanimity in the various councils. Require 3 readings of the motion to remove. Require non-secret voting. &c.
In summary, i think board member removal process needs to be difficult by requiring certain level of consensus across SO/AC on a particular issue that lacks other option of resolution.
Yes. But it must be possible. avri