All, let me echo what León said and just add that we are now at a critical point in our work where we have to worry about implementation. León and his sub team are working on a scoping document to go to the lawyers. Nonetheless, we hope you agree that we cannot afford to wait until we have finalized that and received feedback from a law firm, which - as you will recall - is not even hired so far. I would like to thank Sam in particular for getting this initial legal feedback to us as I trust this will help our discussions a great deal. Thomas
Am 08.02.2015 um 13:15 schrieb Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net>:
On 8 Feb 2015, at 13:03, Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr@neustar.biz> wrote:
The questions and answers are interesting as advocacy but cannot be considered legal advice for our work
They are however helpful in that they point up potential difficulties that may be relevant to certain meta issues we will have to consider, such as timescales, and what level of commitment constitutes "firmly committed to". e.g. If we alight upon something that we know ICANN's lawyers consider impossible under the current waythe company is constituted, we may feel the need for an especially strong level of commitment that would encompass commitment to making more radical changes to make the proposal possible. We might also expect some delay in implementation. This may also have a knock on effect on integration of our proposals with CWG Stewardship proposals too. _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community