well said Cheers to Life Shreedeep Rayamajhi [image: https://www.linkedin.com/in/shreedeeprayamajhi] <https://www.linkedin.com/in/shreedeeprayamajhi> +1(301)485-9395(US) *DISCLAIMER:* This message is intended only for the recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:05 PM, John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org> wrote:
On 4 Oct 2016, at 5:43 AM, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
Well said Mathieu.
Thanks again to all members of the CCWG on Accountability that contributed to the final report - it stood the test of unbelievable scrutiny in recent months.
Indeed Bruce! As just one example, it is not at all clear whether a “weaker” model of ICANN accountability (i.e. something failed to provide the community with a statutory right to remove some/all of the Board members) would have actually passed the level of scrutiny that the IANA stewardship transition received.
The enormous effort by the CCWG on Accountability should be recognized as instrumental to the IANA stewardship transition success (even if the community never needs to exercise some of the mechanisms that were the result!)
/John
p.s. my views alone.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community