Alan: It's a good question, and I am also intrigued by the simplicity of this idea. J. Sent via iPhone. Blame Siri.
On May 18, 2015, at 21:19, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
I believe I understand the issues regarding UAs as shadow organizations for the AC/SOs. Although I still have strong reservations and am not sure we need the legal enforceability that they provide, I am willing to accept that they will work.
But I also feel that using such structures will be difficult for the overall community to understand (on an ongoing basis).
I have a simple question. Instead of having a UA and the AC/SO naming people to be their formal representatives in the UA, why can we not simply have the AC/SO Chair or their Delegate(s) be the Members or Designators. These people have legal status, so why do we need the UAs?
I will not be able to join the call in a few hours, but will listen to the recording later in the day.
Alan
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community