Dear Robin, A specific mention to transparency on Board deliberations has been added in the amended document (please see page 7 of the document). If you feel this does not properly address the issue you’ve raised, please let us know so we can better address your concern. Best regards, León
El 06/01/2016, a las 4:26 p.m., Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org> escribió:
Several comments in the public comment period called for a specific WS2 transparency issue of “transparency over board deliberations”. NCSG was among those commenters. How do we include the views of those who’s comments weren’t taken into account in the document / discussion for 1st reading on Rec. 12 in yesterday’s call? The GNSO’s comments don’t come in until next week, so how will they be incorporated into Rec. 12 if we’ve already done the 2 readings before we’ve even seen the GNSO view on Rec. 12? It looks like only the board’s concerns were reflected in the document / discussion for the 1st reading of Rec #12. How do we include other stakeholder concerns in these discussions?
Thanks, Robin
On Jan 6, 2016, at 6:02 AM, Mathieu Weill <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr> wrote:
<Formatted-Annex 12-PROOFED-1stREAD.pdf>