Exactly! Paul Rosenzweig <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq@redbranchconsulting.com> paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com O: +1 (202) 547-0660 M: +1 (202) 329-9650 VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066 <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article...> Link to my PGP Key <http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us16?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=ema...> From: Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 10:23 AM To: Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com> Cc: Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr>; Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>; Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations Dear All, If in view of the Board some Recs. are against public interest and on the other hand they referred to the same issue( public interest to reject a given Recs.) Then I do not understand how they could refer to something for which( in their view ) there is no established definition and reject a Rec. using that non existent basis Regards Kavousd Sent from my iPhone On 15 Dec 2015, at 16:11, Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com <mailto:paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com> > wrote: Since the Board acknowledges in its comments that there is currently no legal definition of “global public interest” the only reasonable answer to this question is “the judgment of 2/3rd of the Board.” To which I would respond that the “judgment of the CCWG-A” reflecting a rough consensus of the community is a far better judge of what is in the global public interest than the what 2/3rd of the Board say …. Indeed, the exercise of the Board’s “big foot” veto on GPI grounds is a textbook example of why greater accountability is needed. Paul Paul Rosenzweig <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq@redbranchconsulting.com> paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com O: +1 (202) 547-0660 M: +1 (202) 329-9650 VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066 <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article...> Link to my PGP Key <http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us16?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=ema...> <image001.png> From: Mathieu Weill [mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 2:47 AM To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au <mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> >; Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations Dear Bruce, Thank you again for providing our group with the Board comment. As raised in the CCWG call today, we are kindly requesting if the Board could provide our group with a response to the following question. What are the legal basis and criteria by which the Board considers a given Recommendation to be contrary to the Global Public Interest ? Clarification would really be useful to help our group, but also the Chartering Organizations, to check our own recommendations. Thank you for sharing this email with the Board, and happy to expand on the question if need be. Best, Thomas, Leon & Mathieu Co-chairs De : accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] De la part de Bruce Tonkin Envoyé : lundi 14 décembre 2015 11:49 À : Accountability Cross Community Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations Hello Jordan, Thanks for posting to the list. The comments are also available in the public comment forum at: http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30n... We had a half day meeting of the full Board on Thursday 10 Dec, and then spent a few hours again with the full Board finalizing the comments yesterday – Sunday 13 Dec. That was in addition to another half day meeting held on Saturday 5 Dec. All dates are relative to my time zone :) Regards, Bruce Tonkin _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
