OK ... I'll give up too. The IRP handed the Board its most severe rebuke in living memory for acting on improper GAC advice and you seem content with that .... Paul Rosenzweig paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com O: +1 (202) 547-0660 M: +1 (202) 329-9650 VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066 Link to my PGP Key -----Original Message----- From: Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams [mailto:ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net] Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 12:55 PM To: Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com> Cc: 'Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams' <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>; 'Kavouss Arasteh' <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>; accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: [CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC consensus, and finishing
As I said, it was not my conclusion but that of the IRP. I am sure you can read that decision ....
I give up. You can't point to an act, or a failure to act, by the GAC, yet you claim it interfered, and the basis for your assertion is that someone else said so. Eric Brunner-Williams Eugene, Oregon