Dear Kavouss, I am sorry you feel that way. As you know, our duty as Co-Chairs is to try to facilitate the discussion amongst all members and participants in our group. I am aware that you have expressed your disagreement with Mr. Shatan’s views in several occasions but I am also aware that, to the best of my knowledge, your disagreement has found no traction in the discussion in the meeting you are referring to, hence I thought the best way to foster and encourage discussion on the issue was to take it to the list. I apologize if my suggestion offended you or if it was perceived as being disrespectful. Of course I didn’t mean it that way at all. I trust you will understand why I suggested to take the discussion to the list and thank you for your kind observation. Best regards, León
El 12/04/2016, a las 6:54 a.m., Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> escribió:
Dear Leon I am disappointed and frustrated by the reaction of some Co-Chairs in conducting the meeting . I had a disagreement with Mr. Satan of IPC on the above subject Due to the closed link between that person and other persons belonging to the same camp, you did not agreed with the argument that I submitted . Mr.Satan and his camp , wrong views were taken BUT what disturbed me more was your statement in saying" kavouss,if you want to continue thus discussion,continue on nailing list" Why should I do that? What was the usefulness of the meeting if an important issue should be discussed outside the call? Why I was treated ? . Kavousd Sent from my iPhone