Feb. 8, 2016
5:40 a.m.
There may be some details which may not satisfy everyone's needs 100%, but overall, I see that we are heading towards finalising the proposal which enhances ICANN's accountability than it is today. I think we are very close to completing the proposal. Now is the time to think of a pragmatic way forward to complete it. Izumi On 2016/02/07 16:06, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Leverage?
Interesting.
I was asked to to it right. Implicitly by being appointed to this CCWG Accountability.
And I feel it is as legitimate to look out for the smaller ccTLDs' interests as for business' or governments'.
If ICANN's processes are effective or not. I know they have never been and are not.
But that does not mean the end justifies the means.
el