Dear colleagues, The ISP are mentioned in the document as directly affected parties, because of their function in address allocation. The important impact of ICANN on ISP through Name policies should also be mentioned: the technical impact of the new gTLD strategy and policies (ie: name collision or universal acceptance) should be highlighted. Best regards, Olivier Muron -----Message d'origine----- De : accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] De la part de Mathieu Weill Envoyé : vendredi, janvier 16, 2015 21:51 À : accountability-cross-community@icann.org Objet : Re: [CCWG-Accountability] Accountability Definitions and scoping Dear Colleagues, Attached is the latest version of the definitions and scoping document. Main edits and points for discussion in Frankfurt are : - transfer of most affected parties into directly affected parties, and flagging whether they are affected through contracts, individual decisions and/or policy (as to outcome of our call #6) - refinement of definition of review mechanisms vs redress mechanisms, following discussion on WA1 mailing list - small edit regarding purpose of accountability Please also note that the proposed definitions of "independence" have not yet been discussed. The document is also available through the Frankfurt meeting agenda on the wiki (https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51414991). See you all in Frankfurt Best Mathieu Le 12/01/2015 18:53, Mathieu Weill a écrit :
Dear Colleagues,
In anticipation of the call tomorrow, please find an updated version of the draft document mentioned below.
Main edits include : - alternate proposal to capture the discussion around purpose of accountability during last week's call - various comments from Kavouss - other minor edits following feedbacks received off list
Best, Mathieu PS: edits are apparent in this version
Le 05/01/2015 16:44, Mathieu Weill a écrit :
Dear Colleagues,
Please find attached a document drafted by the co-Chairs intended to provide baseline definitions for our work. It is designed to address some of the early questions we raised such as to whom should Icann be accountable ? What is the purpose of Icann's accountability ? or what is accountability ?
We provide the document for your reading before the meeting but I will introduce the document during our call tomorrow, and comments will be welcome during the call or after on this email thread.
We are well aware of the importance of the choice of words in the definitions and of their consequences for guiding the work of our group going forward. This document is a strawman, so feedback in the form of proposed edits will be much appreciated.
Best,
-- ***************************** Mathieu WEILL AFNIC - directeur général Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06 mathieu.weill@afnic.fr Twitter : @mathieuweill ***************************** _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.