Hi, I should note that the conversation continued after I froze the snapshot for chair approval. The document is a live Drive doc and can be found at: <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c4Eab_fZMCQeeYvhy8OcE6f_PqhGza2qW4-UgFn8...> avri On 19-Jan-15 00:13, Avri Doria wrote:
Hi,
Apologies for this last minute contribution to our meeting, but the CWG is still developing its solution and it has proven challenging to nail down the accountability dependencies. The attached document, is a draft/snapshot of where we have gotten to at this point. The issues are still under discussion as we have both the mainstream 'Frankfurt' model that was the subject of our comment draft and have several alternative 'Internal model' proposals that are being discussed based on comments received. Some of these dependency concerns may be more applicable to one model than another, but even that is still difficult to accurately delineate. Also in some instances, like the IAP (Independent Appeals Panel) we have yet to 'decide' whether this uses a mechanism that the CCWG-Accountability might create or is a structure the transition team builds separately.
The dependencies paper is short and does not include much by way of description or explanation - the Stewardship solution is still under discussion. I will be happy to provide as much explanation as I can during the meeting, as I am sure the various other members/participants of the CWG-Stewardship who are attending this week's meeting will do.
I will bring back to the CWG-Stewardship any comments the CCWG may have on thses issues. I suggest that the WA3 will be able to continue to dig deeper after our meeting.
Thanks avri