Hi, Even though I would have preferred seeing board's comment earlier than now. I believe what is written below is still order. I quote a section below that may need to be in bold as well. "....if we have views on that proposal, we should participate with the community." We are still in proposal development process and board is participating in the process. Regards Sent from my Asus Zenfone2 Kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 8 Sep 2015 19:58, "Paul Rosenzweig" < paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:
All
In preparation for our call today, I wanted to share with you the following that I pulled from the hearing that the Senate Commerce Committee held earlier this year:
***
The Chairman: Will the ICANN Board send a proposal to NTIA that lessens the Board’s power or authority?
Mr. Chehade: We will if the community and the stakeholders present us with a proposal. We will give it to NTIA, and we committed already that we will not change the proposal, that if we have views on that proposal, we should participate with the community. Once that proposal comes from our stakeholders, we will pass it on to NTIA *as is*.
***
I would read this as a commitment from ICANN and the Board.
Paul
Paul Rosenzweig
Red Branch Consulting, PLLC
509 C St. NE
Washington, DC 20002
paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com <paul.rosenzweigesq@redbranchconsulting.com>
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
www.redbranchconsulting.com
www.paulrosenzweigesq.com
Link to my PGP Key <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article...>
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community