I think the Netmundial outcome, not the current initiative, may indeed be worth considering for the >recommendations it makes about accountability.
Indeed Cheers, Roelof Meijer SIDN | Meander 501 | 6825 MD | P.O. Box 5022 | 6802 EA | ARNHEM | THE NETHERLANDS T +31 (0)26 352 55 00 | M +31 (0)6 11 395 775 | F +31 (0)26 352 55 05 roelof.meijer@sidn.nl<mailto:roelof.meijer@sidn.nl> | www.sidn.nl<http://www.sidn.nl/> From: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org>> Date: maandag 12 januari 2015 15:15 To: "accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>" <accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-Accountability] the term "community" On 11-Jan-15 11:58, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote: Dear Mr Arasteh. I have also not referred to the outcome of NetMundial. So I am quite pleased that we have reached consensus to formally object to its existence and any related output. Not sure where this 'consensus' comes from. I think the Netmundial outcome, not the current initiative, may indeed be worth considering for the recommendations it makes about accountability. avri