On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 08:17:03PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
I thought a significant part of the rather tortured discussion we had about the Mission was precisely to counter that the tendency of ICANN (or others) to think that its scope of interest -- public or otherwise -- in the stability of the Internet is properly limited.
Well, that sentence got lost on its way to its conclusion. Teach me to make dinner in between starting and ending an email. What I meant, of course, was that the discussion was to counter the tendency of some to think that ICANN's scope is unlimited guardianship of the Internet, and therefore to limit the scope properly to the important but narrow work that ICANN actually does. My apologies. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com