Thanks, Mathieu, for this helpful proposal. I've got a couple questions for clarifications about some statements on the slides. 1. On slide 7, the last one, on point 2 it says "Ensure that Board briefings on CCWG are (also) provided by CCWG co-chairs". Does this mean those briefings will be provided to CCWG members via the co-chairs? Or was the "by" meant to be a "to" in that statement (or something else)? It wasn't quite clear to me. 2. Also on slide 7, point 4 on the substantive work of the sub-teams (sub-part 2) "coordination by new small group (SO/AC reps, Board, Lawyers) to limit friction, no decision-making". Presumably this means the SO/AC reps appointed to CCWG. But which "board" members and which "lawyers" are proposed to coordinate the sub-teams in this new small group? Thanks much! Best, Robin On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Mathieu Weill wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
In anticipation of a discussion during our meeting tomorrow, please find attached a set of slides to suggest a way forward, for the group's consideration.
Thank you for your feedbacks.
Best regards, Thomas, Leon & Mathieu <To Dublin and beyond.pdf>_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community