On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:08 PM, Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:
Colleagues
David Post, who is listed as an “observer” of this group (he says incorrectly – that he is a participant) asked me to post the following message on his behalf suggesting an alternate way of going forward. I am not sure what I think of his idea, but I imagine it might be useful to some.
Aother non-participant (John Levine) have posted an opinion as well: http://www.circleid.com/posts/20151010_an_alternative_to_ccwg_overreach/ <http://www.circleid.com/posts/20151010_an_alternative_to_ccwg_overreach/> His SOI from 2011 seems to be current AFAIK: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/hstld-ag/2011-February/000874.html <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/hstld-ag/2011-February/000874.html> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/hstld-ag/2010-January/000060.html <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/hstld-ag/2010-January/000060.html> Please don't shoot the messenger because as Greg Shatan (a participant in this group) already pointed out in comments to the original message I don't think this would be possible at this time without revisiting many months of consensus building... Rubens