My recollection is that pre-ICANN a Court Case in 1997 decided that $30 of the $100 domain fee had no basis in law ... Inquiring minds want to know such things! On 28/01/16 17:28, Avri Doria wrote:
Hi,
Many of us have been asking for a bottom up discussion on this issue since the new gTLD program was approved.
It has never been the right time for such a discussion for one reason or another.
At the very least, I believe they are holding these funds in a separate account, or something like that, until the Board decides what it want s to do. Hard to know for sure.
avri
On 28-Jan-16 11:53, Nigel Roberts wrote:
"Under what law does this money belong to ICANN ..."
On 28/01/16 16:51, Kathryn Kleiman wrote:
$41 million for .SHOP. That's a nice chunk of change! I think this money, however, does not go into the ICANN budget (FWIW). Best, K
-----Original Message----- From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse [mailto:el@lisse.NA] Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 4:48 AM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Cc: directors@omadhina.net Subject: gTLD Auctions vs Travel Costs
Not that I want to have any more travel, but I am sure ICANN can afford the transition costs:
https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/auctionres...
So far 105510127 USD :-)-O
el
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community