We came to this because no SO/AC must be able to introduce a challenge against a ccNSO initiated PDP pertaining to ccNSO policy. And that, much weaker than I like, is not negotiable. I don't see howe we can speak of long established equilibrium, when long established equilibrium makes a difference between SO and AC which this CCWG seems to want to remove. If the BOARD however wishes to retain the long established equilibrium between the functions of SO (MAKING Policy) and AC (ADVISING ON Policy) it has my full support. el On 2016-02-22 19:30 , Roelof Meijer wrote:
So, for clarity, connecting two seemingly separate issues:
* If a SO-run PDP leads to a bylaw change, blocking that change would /*require*/ /*the support*/ of the relevant SO
And
* If the board wants to implement GAC advice and the community intends to prevent that by recalling the board, the GAC /*does not even have a say*/
Steve and his board are quite right, in my opinion: “the long established equilibrium” is up for grabs
Best,
Roelof [...] -- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/