Hi, On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:06:58PM +0100, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
You gave opened the Entire Recs 1 and 11 for discussion
That isn't my intention. It seems to me that these are the issues people are discussing. I don't think it's helpful to try on procedural grounds to artificially restrict this to recommendation x or y when clearly the issue that some people has involves the interplay of more than one of what's in draft 3. The goal is to complete the document, not to stick to the rules.
If every body to be intentionally and expressly confused then the two above-mentioned RECs. to be opened entirely.
I was rather trying to pick apart different threads I observe, in the hope of reducing confusion. I regret that I was not successful in this case (although one might be excused for wondering whether that is one's only regret at this stage! :-) ) Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com