Nov. 16, 2015
1:49 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:08:22PM +0000, Nigel Roberts wrote:
In my view, the reason this has been resisted, is that the ICANN Establishment would see this as a threat to the larger 'empire' it has created.
I'm not really sure why this list is the correct place to discuss post-transition arrangements for IANA -- even for names -- given that ICANN has a whole working group talking about that very topic. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com