OK maybe re-stated: ICANN is not a regulator, nor should it attempt to control content through its contracts -----Original Message----- From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Thursday, 17 December 2015 6:23 AM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] FW: Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations On 16-Dec-15 05:27, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
(2) ICANN is not a regulator, and does not regulate content through these contracts.
doesn't this just mean it is not a content regulator without indicating that it is not a regulator in any other aspect of the role? avri --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community