April 9, 2016
1:13 p.m.
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 09:23:34AM +0200, Thomas Rickert wrote:
If a rogue Board tries to prevent the EC from seating Board members of their liking by removing them straight away, we should remove the Board.
I think that changing the Board process would not address the root cause of the issue, which would be a Board not playing by the rules.
Having opened this issue for discussion, after the discussion I think I'm now convinced by the above. My original worry was that this could all be a little disruptive, but I think Thomas is right: if the Board is really that hopeless, there's no reason to suppose it'll get better with a single member. You might as well just replace the Board. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com