[CCWG-ACCT] interplay between 'old' and 'new' IRPs

I have a question about old and new IRPs. Old being the many currently active (notably taking up way more panelists than this group's proposal affords on the standing panel) and how they would relate to a new standing panel. If the .Africa appeal drags on for example into a second IRP (as it looks like booking.com will), eventually a new appeals system will be put in place. I'd expect you could then launch a fresh appeal (third IRP) to that new panel because it is basically a new court, presumably followed by a fourth appeal of the appeal. So that's a total of four IRPs for .Africa before going to the courts. Has any thought gone into how this would work (or not?). Best, J.