What about provided by parties under the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) or the Registry Agreement (RA). J. Beckwith Burr Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006 Office: +1.202.533.2932 Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / neustar.biz <http://www.neustar.biz> On 11/17/15, 1:35 PM, "Mueller, Milton L" <milton@gatech.edu> wrote:
I am fine with replacing "covered by" the RAA/RA with "provided by parties to" the RAA/RA as Malcolm suggests below --MM
-----Original Message----- I'm afraid "covered by" is unacceptably broad; it could be read as including anything mentioned within those contracts, which woud enable those that agree such contracts to defeat the previous clause.
I am not clear on the underlying rationale, but I am guessing that the RA/RAA contracts may impose requirements on the information services (e.g. web sites) provided by Registries and Registrars, and so a carve-out is needed so that this may continue. If this understanding is correct, I would suggest
"other than information services provided by parties to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) or the Registry Agreement (RA)"
I hope that helps.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_ listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lU Lrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=SgsFb5SKtIl0YbCsoOu4cu j3G_Kwu9p9vDxn2nn_My8&s=GllbyBFg63u0C4L_G2ONXvv4BGZsdpeGoqi1vcgh_zQ&e=