I think Bruce's language is too vague. It should be clear that the group must be chartered by at least two SO/ACs. Greg On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina@mpicc.de> wrote:
Agree with Bruce and Alan (with the idea, the suggested wording might need a bit of fine-tuning). The broad/neutral language is much more suitable for the bylaw. Whether this will be a separate group (doesn't make sense to me personally) or a part of broader WS2 group and how it will be chartered can be decided later. Best regards Tatiana
On 09/02/16 10:05, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
I suggest replacing the text:
“ (or another Cross Community Working Group chartered for such purpose by one or more Supporting Organizations or Advisory Committees) “
With
“Or another appropriately chartered, generally/widely supported, cross community working group” as per Alan’s suggestion.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community