Amusement value notwithstanding, and whether he has a point or not, I feel that the ICANN board ought to have done something at the time, if they had not preapproved of the appointment. They saw fit to let it slide. Not, perhaps, what my own preferred response would have been, but certainly within the range of reasonable choices available to a board with almost no practical corrective sanctions available to it. Now they have to tolerate any such howling and take it on the chin. To do otherwise would look weak and vacillating and would teach (formerly Canadian) wolves to chase the sledge. Sent from my iPad
On 5 Feb 2016, at 04:43, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <epilisse@gmail.com> wrote:
We have discussed this here before and hence I feel I should follow up that the junior Senator from Alberta has drafted a letter which I think is worth reading:
http://www.cruz.senate.gov/files/documents/Letters/20160203_FadiChehadeLette...
Now my support to the Senator is limited to amusement, but he may just have a point here.
el -- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini 4 _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community