On 1 October 2015 at 00:12, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:12 PM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii@gmail.com> wrote:
Board's reaction to CCWG proposal has come as a surprise.
Really?
Yes . Really. I refer you to the meeting that was held on 2 September 2015. https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56133316 I also refer you to the meeting with Board which was held in BA. Please read the transcript. You can see there is no outright rejection of a suggested model. https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/sun-board-ccwg-accountability
I hope it can be remedied by disclosing the basis on which Board has decided to disagree with CCWG and come up with a new approach .
I think a lot has been said about reasons on this list, whether the CCWG agree that the reasons are important and valid is another thing entirely
I think that you are wrong Seun. We still are not clear what the Board means by the "gaps" in CCWG proposal. we are still not clear on why the Board has come up with a new approach or their so called MEM mechanism. We have 40 questions from the 2 September meeting, most of them unanswered. I think you guys went to LA to get answers but ... did you? If their decision is solely based on Jones Day impact analysis then why did we need CCWG ? we should have just asked Jones Day to come up with a new model! If their decision is based on other advice and deliberation as well, why not disclose it? What is so wrong with that? Regards
On 30 September 2015 at 20:58, Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org> wrote:
I also support this request for transparency / openness, and would find the points discussed very useful to enhancing my own understanding of the underlying issues. I am probably not alone in that respect.
Thanks, Robin
On Sep 30, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
Dear Co Chair, I fully support Dr. Regarding transparency and openness Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Sep 2015, at 18:54, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA> wrote:
Dear Co-Chairs,
I can not receive a response hereto in my in-tray. Can you please advise?
el
On 2015-09-28 00:17, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote: Dear Co-Chairs,
I understand that CCWG's Counsel met with ICANN's Counsel.
I have not seen the report/minutes/notes from the meeting.
Can you please ask staff to expedite transcription and posting to the list?
greetings, el
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/ _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-accountability5 mailing list Ccwg-accountability5@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability5
-- Farzaneh
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>*
Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!
-- Farzaneh