Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Summary of current Board sentiment
Hi, So nothing changed in LA, and any understandings to the contrary are mistaken? avri Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> </div><div>Date:09/27/2015 10:48 AM (GMT-08:00) </div><div>To: CCWG Accountability <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> </div><div>Cc: </div><div>Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Summary of current Board sentiment </div><div> </div>Hello Eberhard,
can you please "share your understanding" of what you mean below in the form of an executive summary?
OK - I will try. - the Board was getting some feedback that it wasn't aligned with the detailed comments that it submitted - so we wanted to confirm that yes the comments we submitted represent our views on the draft proposal, and our suggestions for improvement. - the Board wanted to be clear that we want to work with the CCWG on a common proposal that we can all support. As Keith noted, this means all including the Board will need to compromise, without compromising our joint goals. Regards, Bruce Tonkin _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Hello Avri,
So nothing changed in LA, and any understandings to the contrary are mistaken?
If you mean is the Board going to issue a new set of comments on the current draft proposal, that is not our intent. The comments related to the draft proposal, not to discussions in the past couple of days. As the CCWG updates the text of its proposal taking into account the public comments and the feedback from those that attended the two day meeting in Los Angeles in-person and online, Board members will continue to offer feedback and suggestions in good faith along with other community members. Yesterday there were several sessions where Board members worked alongside other members of the community to come up with various processes, and I assume the outcomes will be captured into draft text and discussed on this list and CCWG calls. As new text emerges - I will share on the Board list and pass on any feedback that I receive. Regards, Bruce Tonkin
Bruce +1 Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Sep 2015, at 15:53, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
Hello Avri,
So nothing changed in LA, and any understandings to the contrary are mistaken?
If you mean is the Board going to issue a new set of comments on the current draft proposal, that is not our intent. The comments related to the draft proposal, not to discussions in the past couple of days.
As the CCWG updates the text of its proposal taking into account the public comments and the feedback from those that attended the two day meeting in Los Angeles in-person and online, Board members will continue to offer feedback and suggestions in good faith along with other community members.
Yesterday there were several sessions where Board members worked alongside other members of the community to come up with various processes, and I assume the outcomes will be captured into draft text and discussed on this list and CCWG calls. As new text emerges - I will share on the Board list and pass on any feedback that I receive.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
participants (3)
-
avri doria -
Bruce Tonkin -
Kavouss Arasteh